Voting, Voting, Voting

[Mamiamato24]

Oh voting, one of those things in life that make no sense.
What am I talking about?
Example:

Pretend there's an election. Three candidates.
Pretend the person that got 40% of the votes won, while the other 2 divided the 30% equally.
Truth is, 60% of the people didn't want that one person to win, but they did win.

What does this have to do with the Survival Games?
Well we all know we can vote for the next map to be played.
Things like these happen when the winning map wins, but more people voted against it then for it.

I have a suggestion that will fix this:
So we do the regular old voting.
The winning map is played.
Next game, the map that was 2nd popular plays next.
Then the 3rd popular.
Every 3 games, there is voting.

This would be a good solution because:
1) Some maps get played repetitively, which is quite annoying.
2) You won't have all those "VOTE 2, VOTE 2" people (not map 2, but any map).
3) People will get the maps they want more.

It's just a fast idea I came up with.
Not perfect, just a suggestion.
Feel free to ask questions about it or add things to it

 

[cameron224]

That would be so annoying. Not every person plays 3 rounds on the same server, and It doesnt need to be equal plays... Its going to be how the Majority of players on the server want to play. If its the same map more than once, then so be it.

As much as you may dislike it. The voting system is fair and will not change.

 

[Mamiamato24]

I don't dislike the voting system, I was just giving an idea.

 

[cameron224]

I just think doing it that way would make it identical to the "random map" system that we just removed.

 

[ShaunDepro]

What about players that join in the second/third map lobbies and didn't like those maps?

 

[Mamiamato24]

I had an idea, but it would be too confusing....